THE ROLE OF KARMA AND BELIEF IN JUSTICE AMONG NEPALESE PEOPLE
The concept of karma, rooted deeply in
Hinduism and Buddhism, profoundly influences Nepalese cultural understandings
of justice and moral order. Karma, broadly defined as the law of moral
causation—where good or bad actions lead to corresponding outcomes—shapes how
many Nepalese interpret personal fate, social justice, and ethical behavior.
This belief system plays a dual role in both reinforcing social norms and
affecting attitudes toward formal justice mechanisms.
In traditional Nepalese society, karma
serves as a spiritual framework that explains misfortune, success, and social
inequalities as consequences of past actions, sometimes extending beyond a
single lifetime (Gellner, 2001). This worldview encourages acceptance and
patience, promoting social harmony by reducing overt conflict. For instance,
victims of injustice or hardship may find solace in believing their suffering
is karmic retribution, which can foster resilience and moral reflection
(Pettigrew, 2004).
However, this same belief may also
undermine pursuit of formal justice. The attribution of personal or societal
problems to karma can lead to passivity and acceptance of inequality,
especially in cases of caste discrimination, gender-based violence, or poverty
(Khadka, 2015). Such a perspective risks legitimizing systemic injustice by
framing it as morally deserved, thus impeding social change and legal redress
(Bista, 1991). Critics argue that over-reliance on karmic explanations can
discourage activism and critical questioning of social structures.
Moreover, the intertwining of karma
with local notions of justice also reflects in informal dispute resolution
practices in Nepal, such as community mediation and panchayat systems,
where restorative rather than punitive approaches prevail (Shrestha, 2013).
These mechanisms emphasize reconciliation and moral correction over formal
legal processes, reflecting karmic ideas of balance and renewal.
Recent modernization and legal reforms,
including human rights advocacy, challenge the dominance of karmic beliefs by
promoting universal justice principles and individual rights (ICNL, 2019). The
Nepalese judiciary and civil society increasingly confront tensions between
traditional beliefs and contemporary legal frameworks. Nonetheless, karma
remains a powerful cultural lens influencing how justice is perceived and
enacted at the grassroots level.
In conclusion, the belief in karma
significantly shapes Nepalese conceptions of justice by fostering moral
reflection and social harmony but also by potentially enabling complacency
toward injustice. Understanding this dual role is essential for designing
effective legal and social interventions that respect cultural values while
promoting equity and rights.
REFERENCES
Bista, D. B. (1991). Fatalism and
Development: Nepal's Struggle for Modernization. Orient Longman.
Gellner, D. N. (2001). Resistance
and the State: Nepalese Experiences. Berghahn Books.
ICNL (International Center for
Not-for-Profit Law). (2019). Legal reform and human rights in Nepal: Challenges
and progress. ICNL Report Series.
Khadka, C. (2015). Caste, karma, and
justice: An ethnographic study in Nepal. South Asian Journal of Social Sciences,
10(2), 65–78.
Pettigrew, J. (2004). Living with
karma: Belief and practice in Nepal. Journal of Buddhist Ethics, 11,
215–234.
Shrestha, M. (2013). Informal justice
and community mediation in Nepal: The role of traditional values. Law and
Society Review of Nepal, 5(1), 40–57.
Comments
Post a Comment